Rikitav/Telegrator
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 13 Wiki Activity

WIP: Make the UpdateRecevier not wait for each handler #4

Closed
XSilverTH wants to merge 3 commits from parallelhandler into master
pull from: parallelhandler
merge into: Rikitav:master
Conversation 2 Commits 3 Files Changed 2
+59 -43
XSilverTH commented 2025-12-18 14:03:43 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

I have no idea if awaiting each handler was intended behavior but it seems wrong to me to freeze the whole bot just because a command is taking long to execute

I have no idea if awaiting each handler was intended behavior but it seems wrong to me to freeze the whole bot just because a command is taking long to execute
Rikitav commented 2025-12-27 08:19:21 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

The receiver is not a component that is responsible for the execution of handlers. This is handled by IUpdateRouter, the standard implementation uses a pool to manage the life of handlers. For more info check : https://github.com/Rikitav/Telegrator/blob/master/Telegrator/Polling/UpdateRouter.cs

The receiver is not a component that is responsible for the execution of handlers. This is handled by IUpdateRouter, the standard implementation uses a pool to manage the life of handlers. For more info check : https://github.com/Rikitav/Telegrator/blob/master/Telegrator/Polling/UpdateRouter.cs
XSilverTH commented 2025-12-29 12:53:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

i still don't know if executing handlers synchronously was intended behaviour or not
considering MaximumParallelWorkingHandlers exists i assume not

i still don't know if executing handlers synchronously was intended behaviour or not considering MaximumParallelWorkingHandlers exists i assume not

Pull request closed

This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something isn't working
 documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
 duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
 enhancement
New feature or request
 good first issue
Good for newcomers
 help wanted
Extra attention is needed
 invalid
This doesn't seem right
 question
Further information is requested
 wontfix
This will not be worked on
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
Rikitav
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Rikitav/Telegrator#4
Delete Branch "parallelhandler"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?